Skip to main content

How to Choose Right Database - Part - 2 (SQL v/s No-SQL)

We selected the database based on specific use cases in the first part. This section will be more interesting where we will discuss SQL and No-SQL databases, and what are the factors that influence their selection. 

SQL Database:

  • SQL (Structured Query Language) databases are relational database management systems (RDBMS) that use a structured query language (SQL) for defining, querying, and manipulating data.
  • They organize data into tables with rows and columns, enforcing a predefined schema. SQL databases are characterized by their adherence to ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties, making them suitable for applications requiring strict data integrity and complex transactions.

No-SQL Database:

  • NoSQL (Not Only SQL) databases are a broad category of database management systems that provide mechanisms for storage and retrieval of data modeled in formats other than traditional tabular relations used in relational databases. 
  • NoSQL databases offer flexible schema design, and horizontal scalability, and support various data models including key-value pairs, documents, graphs, and wide-column stores.
  • They are often used for handling large-scale, distributed data with requirements for high availability, scalability, and flexibility, prioritizing performance and scalability over strict consistency.
Selecting an SQL and No-SQL database depends on many factors like:
  1. Structure of the data
  2. Consistency requirement
  3. Transaction requirement
  4. Data Complexity
  5. Schema Flexibility
  6. Query Language
Let's discuss them in detail:

  • Structure of the Data:

    • SQL Database:
      • SQL databases use a structured, tabular format with a predefined schema.
      • Data is organized into tables with rows and columns, making them suitable for applications with well-defined data models and relationships. 
      • SQL databases enforce data integrity through constraints, and they support complex queries, joins, and transactions.
    • No-SQL Database:
      • NoSQL databases offer a more flexible schema design, allowing developers to store and retrieve data in various formats such as key-value pairs, documents, graphs, or wide-column stores. 
      • They are ideal for applications with evolving or unstructured data, as they can accommodate changes in data structure without requiring a predefined schema. 
      • NoSQL databases excel in handling semi-structured or unstructured data, making them suitable for use cases like content management systems, real-time analytics, and IoT applications.

  • Consistency Requirement:

    • SQL Database:
      • SQL databases prioritize strong consistency and adhere to the ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties. Transactions in SQL databases are fully consistent, ensuring that data remains in a valid state at all times. 
      • Strong consistency guarantees that every read operation returns the most recent write, making SQL databases suitable for applications with stringent data consistency requirements, such as financial systems or e-commerce platforms.
    • No-SQL Database:
      • NoSQL databases often follow the BASE (Basically Available, Soft state, Eventually consistent) model, which prioritizes availability and partition tolerance over strict consistency. 
      • They may sacrifice strong consistency in favor of performance, availability, and fault tolerance, allowing them to operate in distributed environments with high availability requirements. 
      • While eventual consistency may lead to temporary inconsistencies in data, it enables NoSQL databases to handle network partitions, node failures, and scalability challenges more effectively, making them suitable for distributed systems and applications where high availability is critical. 

  • Transaction Requirement:

    • SQL Database:
      • SQL databases support multi-row transactions and ensure ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties for data integrity. Transactions in SQL databases guarantee that all changes to the database occur atomically and maintain consistency across multiple operations.
      • ACID compliance is essential for applications that require transactional consistency and data reliability, such as banking systems, inventory management, or reservation systems.
    • No-SQL Database:
      • NoSQL databases may have limited support for transactions and may prioritize availability and performance over strong consistency.
      • While some NoSQL databases offer transactional capabilities, they may impose restrictions on the types of operations that can be performed within a transaction or the level of consistency guaranteed.
      • NoSQL databases often provide eventual consistency, where updates to the database propagate asynchronously and may result in temporary inconsistencies.
      • Applications using NoSQL databases should be designed to handle eventual consistency and resolve conflicts or inconsistencies as needed.

  • Data Complexity:

    • SQL Database:
      • SQL databases enforce a rigid schema with predefined tables, columns, and data types, making schema changes complex and requiring careful planning.Altering the schema in SQL databases may involve downtime, data migration, and potential impact on existing applications or queries.
      • While SQL databases provide data consistency and enforce data integrity through schema constraints, they may be less flexible in accommodating changes to the data model or evolving business requirements. 
    • No-SQL Database:
      • NoSQL databases offer schema flexibility and allow developers to store data without a predefined schema or with a dynamic schema that can evolve over time.
      • NoSQL databases support schema-less data models, where each document or record can have a different structure or set of fields. Schema-less design enables NoSQL databases to adapt to changing data requirements and simplify application development by eliminating the need for upfront schema design or schema migrations.
      • NoSQL databases provide agility and scalability for applications with rapidly changing data models or unpredictable data formats, allowing developers to iterate quickly and innovate without constraints.

  • Schema Flexibility:

    • SQL Database:
      • SQL databases enforce a rigid schema with predefined tables, columns, and data types, making schema changes complex and requiring careful planning.
      • Altering the schema in SQL databases may involve downtime, data migration, and potential impact on existing applications or queries.
      • While SQL databases provide data consistency and enforce data integrity through schema constraints, they may be less flexible in accommodating changes to the data model or evolving business requirements. 
    • No-SQL Database:
      • NoSQL databases offer schema flexibility and allow developers to store data without a predefined schema or with a dynamic schema that can evolve over time.
      • NoSQL databases support schema-less data models, where each document or record can have a different structure or set of fields. Schema-less design enables NoSQL databases to adapt to changing data requirements and simplify application development by eliminating the need for upfront schema design or schema migrations.
      • NoSQL databases provide agility and scalability for applications with rapidly changing data models or unpredictable data formats, allowing developers to iterate quickly and innovate without constraints.

  • Query language:

    • SQL Database:
      • SQL databases use standardized SQL (Structured Query Language) for querying and manipulating data.
      • SQL provides a rich set of features for data retrieval, filtering, sorting, aggregation, and joins, making it well-suited for applications with complex querying requirements. 
      • SQL's declarative syntax allows developers to express queries concisely and intuitively, facilitating efficient data analysis and reporting.
    • No-SQL Database:
      • NoSQL databases do not strictly adhere to SQL and may use proprietary query languages or APIs specific to each database type. 
      • While NoSQL databases may lack the expressive power of SQL, they often provide specialized query capabilities optimized for specific use cases, such as document-oriented queries in MongoDB or graph traversals in Neo4j. 
      • NoSQL databases offer flexibility in data modeling and querying, allowing developers to tailor their data access patterns to match the application's requirements.

  • Example:

    • SQL Database:
      • Examples of SQL databases include MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle Database, Microsoft SQL Server, and SQLite.
      •  SQL databases have been widely used in traditional relational database management systems (RDBMS) for decades and are well-suited for applications with structured data and complex querying requirements.
    • No-SQL Database:
      • Examples of NoSQL databases include MongoDB, Cassandra, Couchbase, Redis, Amazon DynamoDB, and Apache HBase. 
      • NoSQL databases have gained popularity in recent years for their scalability, flexibility, and performance advantages in handling large volumes of unstructured or semi-structured data. 
      • NoSQL databases are commonly used in web applications, big data analytics, real-time processing, and distributed systems where traditional SQL databases may be lesser suitable.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CAP Theorem - Debunking Myths

The CAP theorem is a widely recognized idea in the field of distributed systems. It represents three key concepts: Consistency, Availability, and Partition Tolerance. While most of us are familiar with its definition, the devil lies in the details. In this discussion, we'll clarify common myths and misunderstandings. We'll start by explaining the CAP theorem in detail, and then explore various scenarios that may challenge the common interpretation of it. CAP theorem also known as Brewer's theorem states that any distributed data store can provide only two of the following three guarantees: Consistency:  For every read request, the system should provide the most recent write or an error. Note that this consistency is different from the consistency of the  ACID theorem Availability:   For every request, the system should provide a response, even if it’s not the latest data.  In other words, all non-failing (healthy) nodes in the distributed system return a valid ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding Merkle Tree

A Merkle Tree is a cryptographic tree structure used in computer science and distributed systems to efficiently verify the integrity of large sets of data (accuracy and consistency of data over its lifecycle).  Merkle Tree, also known as Hash Tree is a tree of hash values.  It has a tree structure in which each leaf node is a hash of a small portion of the data, and each non-leaf node is a hash of its children. It is used in applications such as  NoSQL databases, Git, Cryptocurrencies,  File Systems, etc. Some key characteristics of Merkle Tree are: Binary Tree Structure:  The Merkle Tree is a binary tree, where each leaf node represents a hash of data. Leaf Nodes: The data set is divided into fixed-size blocks or "leaves". Each leaf node contains the hash of a specific data block or piece of information. Non-Leaf Nodes: Non-leaf nodes in the tree represent the hash of the concatenation of their child node's hashes.  If the number of leaves is odd...
Post a Comment
Read more

Event Driven Architecture - SAGA Pattern (Part-1 : Choreography Model)

The Saga pattern is a distributed transactional pattern used in microservices architecture to maintain data consistency across multiple services. It helps manage long-running transactions involving multiple services by breaking them down into smaller, more manageable work units. There is a famous Database per Service  pattern in the Microservice world. Under this paradigm, each service maintains its own dedicated database. Some business transactions, however, span multiple services so we need a mechanism to implement transactions that span through services. Take, for instance, the scenario of placing an online order, which involves actions like inventory verification and item reservation till payment completion. Since services such as Orders, Inventory, and Payment operate on separate databases, the application cannot simply use a local ACID transaction. 2 Phase Commit Protocol  is one of the options being used for ensuring transactions across services. However, it has se...
Post a Comment
Read more